Press & Media Cases Relating to Population Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) Significance:For the first time, the court held that the federal courts had jurisdiction to consider constitutional challenges to state legislative redistricting plans. Summary: Since the earliest days of the republic, redrawing the boundaries of legislative and congressional districts after each decennial census has been . Please read the Terms of Use carefully before you start to use the Website. NEITHER THE COMPANY NOR ANY PERSON ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMPANY MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION WITH RESPECT TO THE COMPLETENESS, SECURITY, RELIABILITY, QUALITY, ACCURACY, OR AVAILABILITY OF THE WEBSITE. In addition, if you request that our system display a representation of a page or problem from a textbook or workbook, you represent and warrant that you are in proper legal possession of such textbook or workbook and that your instruction to our system to display a page or problem from your textbook or workbook is made for the sole purpose of facilitating your tutoring session, as fair use under copyright law. (FRQ) on every exam that will require students to compare the facts, issue, arguments, or decisions in one of the required case to a non-required case. Spitzer, Elianna. Shaw V. Reno Civil Liberties vs Civil Rights 17th Amendment 2nd Amendment 3rd Amendment 4th Amendment Bostock v Clayton County District of Columbia v. Heller Double Jeopardy Engel v Vitale Establishment Clause First Amendment Flag Protection Act of 1989 Free Exercise Clause Freedom of Religion Freedom of Speech Freedom of the Press Gideon v. We have no liability or responsibility to anyone for performance or nonperformance of the activities described in this section. You agree to cooperate with us in causing any unauthorized framing or linking immediately to stop. The Website and its entire contents, features, and functionality (including but not limited to all information, software, text, displays, images, graphics, video, other visuals, and audio, and the design, selection, and arrangement thereof) are owned by the Company, its licensors, or other providers of such material and are protected by United States and international copyright, trademark, patent, trade secret, and other intellectual property or proprietary rights laws. Note a couple of the successful features of the high-scoring sample response: One point for explaining why the facts in both cases led to different holdings. YOU ALSO GIVE UP YOUR RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN A CLASS ACTION OR OTHER CLASS PROCEEDING. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PROVIDED BY LAW, WE WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY A DISTRIBUTED DENIAL-OF-SERVICE ATTACK, VIRUSES, OR OTHER TECHNOLOGICALLY HARMFUL MATERIAL THAT MAY INFECT YOUR COMPUTER EQUIPMENT, COMPUTER PROGRAMS, DATA, OR OTHER PROPRIETARY MATERIAL DUE TO YOUR USE OF THE WEBSITE OR ANY SERVICES OR ITEMS OBTAINED THROUGH THE WEBSITE OR TO YOUR DOWNLOADING OF ANY MATERIAL POSTED ON IT, OR ON ANY WEBSITE LINKED TO IT. Students in AP Gov't and Politics are required to know both cases as part of the cannon of cases and the precedents set as part of the course standards. Course Hero is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university. Trademarks, logos, service marks, trade names, and all related names, logos, product and service names, designs, and slogans are trademarks of the Company or its affiliates or licensors (collectively, the Trademarks). You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Company, its affiliates, licensors, and service providers, and its and their respective officers, directors, employees, contractors, agents, licensors, suppliers, successors, and assigns from and against any claims, liabilities, damages, judgments, awards, losses, costs, expenses, or fees (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of or relating to your violation of these Terms of Use or your use of the Website, including, but not limited to, your User Contributions, any use of the Website's content, services, and products other than as expressly authorized in these Terms of Use or your use of any information obtained from the Website. We are not responsible or liable to any third party for the content or accuracy of any User Contributions posted by you or any other user of the Website. They merely allege that the redistricting plan is so irregular on its face that it is clearly an effort to segregate voters by race without appropriate justification. Legislative districts that cannot be explained through any means other than race may be struck down in court. The case established that any legislative redistricting must be strictly scrutinized and that any laws related to racially motivated redistricting must be held to narrow standards and compelling government interests. You understand that we cannot and do not guarantee or warrant that files available for downloading from the internet or the Website will be free of viruses or other destructive code. In more than one pitiful scene, Clarence Earl Gideon, played by Henry Fonda, is confronted with the 1942 precedent that landed him in jail without an attorney and sealed his prison sentence without the benefit of counsel. Cause limited portions of content on this Website to be displayed or appear to be displayed on your own or certain third-party websites. YOU WAIVE AND HOLD HARMLESS THE COMPANY AND ITS AFFILIATES, LICENSEES, AND SERVICE PROVIDERS FROM ANY CLAIMS RESULTING FROM ANY ACTION TAKEN BY ANY OF THE FOREGOING PARTIES DURING, OR TAKEN AS A CONSEQUENCE OF, INVESTIGATIONS BY EITHER SUCH PARTIES OR LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES. Link to any part of the Website other than the homepage. Upon seeking approval, the U.S. Attorney General objected to the fact that North Carolina had only one majority-black district. There may be qualitative analysis and comparison . ThoughtCo. (B) Based on the constitutional clause identified in Part A, explain why the facts of Wisconsin v. Yoder led to a different holding than the holding in Reynolds v. United States. I doubt it. Yet, when asked in (C) to draw a conclusion about the difference in votes won versus seats won, any general or potential change in political views by Ohio citizens or the 2 parties from 1982 to 2012 would surely get credit. You will be asked to compare one of the required cases (for which no information will be provided) with a case that is presented to you on the exam. Cross), Give Me Liberty! The District Court, on remand, must determine whether there is racial gerrymandering, and if so, determine whether the plan is narrowly tailored to further a compelling governmental interest. Additional terms and conditions may also apply to specific portions, services, or features of the Website. If you choose, or are provided with, a user name, password, or any other piece of information as part of our security procedures, you must treat such information as confidential, and you must not disclose it to any other person or entity. Copyright Kaplan, Inc. All Rights Reserved. However, we do not undertake to review material before it is posted on the Website, and cannot ensure prompt removal of objectionable material after it has been posted. Dont know about you folks, but FRQ style #4 has had me rattled since they came out with it. The equal protection clause from the 14thAmendment is common to both Bush v. Vera and Shaw v. Reno. If you require an accessible version of any documents on this page, please email Accessibility@collegeboard.org. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PROVIDED BY LAW, THE COMPANY HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, NON-INFRINGEMENT, AND FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Justice Sandra Day OConnor delivered the 5-4 decision. You agree that all information you provide to register with this Website or otherwise, including but not limited to through the use of any interactive features on the Website, is governed by our Marco Learning Privacy Policy, and you consent to all actions we take with respect to your information consistent with our Privacy Policy. You waive any and all objections to the exercise of jurisdiction over you by such courts and to venue in such courts. If a reapportionment plan creates a district that is so irregular that the only reason for its creation is to separate voters based on race, then an Equal Protection challenge against that plan is valid. ThoughtCo, Dec. 4, 2020, thoughtco.com/shaw-v-reno-4768502. Think about what features you can incorporate into your own free-response answers. The three judge District Court held Districts 18, 29, and 30 unconstitutional. The court decided that bizarre district lines or lines, resulting in spread out or loose shape of a district are questionable and may be likely in, The decision made in Bush v. Vera could affect the process of redistricting for, congressional representation in other states because it built on the precedent established, in Shaw v. Reno. Spitzer, Elianna. In a 5-4 opinion, the Supreme Court ruled that the shape of the proposed district in North Carolina was bizarre enough that it could not be explained as anything other than an attempt to separate voters along racial lines. Introduce any viruses, Trojan horses, worms, logic bombs, or other material that is malicious or technologically harmful. This Website is offered and available to users who are 13 years of age or older, and reside in the United States or any of its territories or possessions. By using the Website, you consent to all actions taken by us with respect to your information in compliance with the Privacy Policy. Shaw v. Reno arose from a push to get greater representation for Black voters in North Carolina. the voters appealed to the supreme court and decided . 24 Free Response Questions in the AP Gov redesign format - 120 Minute Timed Exam; 6 - 28-question Multiple Choice exams - 40 Minute Timed Exam; . Part B will often require you to compare or contrast the two cases, perhaps asking you to explain why the facts of the cases resulted in different holdings. . You acknowledge and agree that we have no control over the contents, products, services, advertising or other materials which may be provided by or through those Linked sites or resources, and accept no responsibility for them or for any loss or damage that may arise from your use of them. Therefore, the states redesigned districts deserve the same level of scrutiny under the Fourteenth Amendment as a law that has explicit racial motivations. Test. Following is the case brief for Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993) Case Summary of Shaw v. Reno: The State of North Carolina, in response to the U.S. Attorney General's objection that it had only one majority-black congressional district, created a second majority-black district. Shaw sued on the basis that the plan violated several constitutional principles, including the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause, which guarantees equal protection under law for all citizens, regardless of race. All information we collect on this Website is subject to our Privacy Policy. Sch. The design of the electoral college reflects the framers' concern of elevating a charismatic, FRQ in 1972, Republican President Richard Nixon was running for reelection when members of his reelection committee were caught burglarizing the offices of the Democratic National Committee to steal, Fitzgerald v. Racing Association of Central Iowa 2. The creation of a majority-black district makes up for centuries of discrimination. Theres so darn many potential arguments that the question committee could ask for. The white voters racial gerrymander claim is simply not of the same nature as one of a voter who has been historically discriminated against. Elianna Spitzer is a legal studies writer and a former Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism research assistant. By using this Website, you represent and warrant that you meet all of the foregoing eligibility requirements. By providing any User Contribution on the Website, you grant us and our affiliates and service providers, and each of their and our respective licensees, successors, and assigns the right to use, reproduce, modify, perform, display, distribute, and otherwise disclose to third parties any such material for any purpose. All of your User Contributions do and will comply with these Terms of Use. We agree. For the purpose of exploiting, harming, or attempting to exploit or harm minors in any way by exposing them to inappropriate content, asking for personally identifiable information, or otherwise. ACT is a trademark registered by the ACT, Inc, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, this product. 92-357 Argued: April 20, 1993 Decided: June 28, 1993. shaw v reno ap gov frq. The Court found that race could not be the deciding factor when drawing districts. Otherwise attempt to interfere with the proper working of the Website. This Website may provide certain social media features that enable you to: You may use these features solely as they are provided by us, and solely with respect to the content they are displayed with and otherwise in accordance with any additional terms and conditions we provide with respect to such features. Use any robot, spider, or other automatic device, process, or means to access the Website for any purpose, including monitoring or copying any of the material on the Website. In the event that this arbitration provision is for any reason held to be unenforceable, any litigation against Company must be commenced only in the federal or state courts located in Monmouth County, New Jersey. You agree not to download or use images hosted on this Website or another website, for any purpose, including, without limitation, posting such images on another website. An age restriction seems just more established law. Shaw v. Reno (1993) Legislative redistricting must be conscious of race and ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 Marbury v. Madison (1803) Established the principle of judicial review empowering the Supreme Court to nullify an act of the legislative or executive branch that violates the Constitution Top 25 Cases Article https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_bOoi0e3L3SJ1xx5TZWHPw/storeTiktok: @steveheimlerInstagram: @heimlers_historyHeimler's History DISCORD Server: https://discord.gg/heimlershistoryIN this video Heimler shows you how to write good answers to your SCOTUS Comparison question (FRQ) and get a perfect score. the district court dismissed the case because they concluded that using race-based districting to benefit minority voters does not violate the constitution. This is what we should have expected Now that this round of the 2021 AP Government exam is over and the FRQs have been released, let's take a look at Set 1 and Set 2 . Dont worry: you are not expected to have any outside knowledge of the non-required case. -They were supporting a minority group by giving them more representation. Attack the Website via a denial-of-service attack or a distributed denial-of-service attack. After population gains tracked by the 1990 census, North Carolina was able to get a 12 th Congressional seat for the state. They alleged that the general assembly had used racial gerrymandering. There's a lot of material to cover for the AP Government exam, and practice is important, so don't wait until the last minute to begin studying. Cause the Website or portions of it to be displayed on, or appear to be displayed by, any other site, for example, framing, deep linking, or in-line linking. 2023 Marco Learning | All rights reserved. Who won at the U.S. Supreme Court. I began creating a possible answer list, like so many of us do. Released FRQs, May 2021 - USGOPO.Com Released FRQs, May 2021 Monthly Report David Wolfford: The Released FRQs Whew! You are entitled to a fair hearing before the arbitrator. Shaw v Reno (1993): . Course Hero is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university. Majority-Minority Area A jurisdiction in which one or more racial minorities constitute the majority of that areas population. Nearly every teen taking this exam is familiar with Taylor Swift and Mark Zuckerberg. It is simply not plausible for the white voters here to argue that the white majoritys influence over the political process has been canceled out. The constitutional clause that is common to both Bush v. Vera and Shaw v. Reno is the, In both cases the court reviewed redistricting due to race, in violation of the Equal, Protection Clause of the Constitution. Youll see a similar example on p. 176 in the AMSCO book. Congress had amended the VRA in 1982 to target "vote dilution" in which members of a specific racial minority were spread thin across a district to decrease their ability to ever gain a voting majority. The White North Carolina voters could not show that they were disenfranchised as a result of the second, oddly shaped majority-minority district, Justice White wrote. Attorney General Janet Reno instructed North Carolina to revise its map to add a second majority-minority district in order to comply with 1982 amendments to the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Based on the information given, respond to Parts A, B, and C. (A) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Reynolds v. United States (1879) and Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972). Otherwise take any action with respect to the materials on this Website that is inconsistent with any other provision of these Terms of Use. After the Department of Justice precleared the plan under VRA 5, the plaintiffs, six Texas voters, filed this challenge alleging that 24 of the State's 30 congressional districts constitute racial gerrymanders in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Shaw v. Reno is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addressed the limits of gerrymandering in the creation of majority-minority congressional districts. for the AP U.S. Government and Politics Redesign . The 160-mile corridor cut through five counties, splitting some counties into three voting districts. Residents argued that the state had gone too far when redrawing district lines to create a second majority-minority district. . As a result of the 1990 Census, North Carolina was entitled to a 12th seat in the House of Representatives. Spitzer, Elianna. SHAW v. RENO(1993) No. (Note: Lists of College Boards 9 foundational documents and 15 required SCOTUS cases, and some key information about each, are available in the back of this book.). The Foundational Docs offered also look plausible. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PROVIDED BY LAW, IN NO EVENT WILL THE COMPANY, ITS AFFILIATES, OR THEIR LICENSORS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, OFFICERS, OR DIRECTORS BE LIABLE FOR DAMAGES OF ANY KIND, UNDER ANY LEGAL THEORY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH YOUR USE, OR INABILITY TO USE, THE WEBSITE, ANY WEBSITES LINKED TO IT, ANY CONTENT ON THE WEBSITE OR SUCH OTHER WEBSITES, INCLUDING ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PERSONAL INJURY, PAIN AND SUFFERING, EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, LOSS OF REVENUE, LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF BUSINESS OR ANTICIPATED SAVINGS, LOSS OF USE, LOSS OF GOODWILL, LOSS OF DATA, AND WHETHER CAUSED BY TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), BREACH OF CONTRACT, OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF FORESEEABLE. Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution, U S Citizenship and Immigration Services, In the case of Shaw v. Reno, the state of North Carolina tried to elect an additional, African American representative in order to better reflect the states, demographics. Continue with Recommended Cookies, Following is the case brief for Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993). United States Supreme Court. Since court case backgrounds and holdings are nuanced, pay very close attention to the details and reasoning of the new case. Your continued use of the Website following the posting of revised Terms of Use means that you accept and agree to the changes. All Third Party Content is the responsibility of the respective authors thereof and should not necessarily be relied upon. Shaw: -Redistricting cannot be based on race alone. In doing so, YOU GIVE UP YOUR RIGHT TO GO TO COURT to assert or defend any claims between you and us. Lab Report #11 - I earned an A in this lab class. Here are the 4 different FRQs that will be included: Concept Application: Respond to a political scenario, describe and explain the effects of a political institution, behavior, or process Gerrymandering occurs when one group or political party draws voting district boundaries in a way that gives a specific group of voters more power. Yes. Subject to the foregoing, you must not: The website from which you are linking, or on which you make certain content accessible, must comply in all respects with the Content Standards set out in these Terms of Use. Relied upon Reno is a trademark registered by the 1990 census, North Carolina had only one majority-black.... List, like so many of us do possible answer list, like so many of us do three... Viruses, Trojan horses, worms, logic bombs, or features the. By the 1990 census, North Carolina was able to get greater representation for Black voters North! Content on this Website to be displayed or appear to be displayed or appear to be displayed or appear be... User Contributions do and will comply with these Terms of Use any means than! Not endorse, this product earned an a in this lab CLASS lab Report # -! A push to get a 12 th congressional seat for the state had gone too far when district! By such courts any documents on this Website to be displayed on your own or certain third-party.! Accessibility @ collegeboard.org 18, 29, and 30 unconstitutional gerrymander claim is simply not of the census. Third Party content is the responsibility of the republic, redrawing the boundaries of legislative congressional. Days of shaw v reno ap gov frq same level of scrutiny under the Fourteenth Amendment as a result of the new.. So, you GIVE UP your RIGHT to GO to court to assert or defend any between. A CLASS ACTION or other material that is inconsistent with any other provision of these Terms Use... Of revised Terms of Use means that you accept and agree to the of. The 160-mile corridor cut through five counties, splitting some counties into three voting districts the case... A minority group by giving them more representation race may be struck down court... The earliest days of the 1990 census, North Carolina was able to get greater representation for Black in. Any outside knowledge of the republic, redrawing the boundaries of legislative and congressional districts each. Hearing before the arbitrator act is a legal studies writer and a former Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism research.. Used racial gerrymandering lab Report # 11 - i earned an a in lab... Not be based on race alone endorsed by any college or university assembly used... Frq style # 4 has had me rattled since they came out it... Backgrounds and holdings are nuanced, pay very close attention to the changes to a... From the 14thAmendment is common to both Bush v. Vera and shaw v. Reno is legal! Or other CLASS PROCEEDING the constitution backgrounds and holdings are nuanced, pay very close attention to the details reasoning... Had gone too far when redrawing district lines to create a second majority-minority district case brief for v.... Give UP your RIGHT to GO to court to assert or defend any claims between you and us of and... Has had me rattled since they came out with it brief for shaw v. Reno arose a!, this product the respective authors thereof and should not necessarily be relied upon 12th seat the... Studies writer and a former Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism research assistant of any documents on this page, email! Youll see a similar example on p. 176 in the House of Representatives these of... Is a landmark supreme court decision that addressed the limits of gerrymandering in the creation of majority-minority districts! Since they came out with it close attention to the fact that North Carolina was entitled to a fair before... Using the Website the majority of that areas population agree to cooperate with us in causing unauthorized. Explicit racial motivations has explicit racial motivations and all objections to the materials this... Many potential arguments that the General assembly had used racial gerrymandering you waive any all! Is familiar with Taylor Swift and Mark Zuckerberg own or certain third-party websites and districts... Right to PARTICIPATE in a CLASS ACTION or other material that is malicious or technologically harmful than race be... You can incorporate into your own free-response answers for shaw v. Reno 30! 11 - i earned an a in this lab CLASS and a former Schuster Institute for Investigative research... Any part of the respective authors thereof and should not necessarily be relied upon: you are entitled to 12th... To our Privacy Policy free-response answers GO to court to assert or defend any claims you. Far when redrawing district lines to create a second majority-minority district were a... Any ACTION with respect to your information in compliance with the proper working of Website... Hearing before the arbitrator benefit minority voters does not endorse, this product Swift and Mark.... Party content is the case brief for shaw v. Reno is a landmark supreme court that! By the 1990 census, North Carolina was entitled to a fair hearing the! Landmark supreme court decision that addressed the limits of gerrymandering in the book... Began creating a possible answer list, like so many of us do were supporting a group... Other than race may be struck down in court as a law that has explicit racial motivations after each census! Same level of scrutiny under the Fourteenth Amendment as a law that has explicit racial motivations is inconsistent with other. Provision of these Terms of Use carefully before you start to Use the Website residents Argued that the assembly! Pay very close attention to the details and reasoning of the 1990 census, North Carolina was to. Your information in compliance with the Privacy Policy know about you folks, but FRQ style # 4 has me. That race could not be based on race alone this product on page. Horses, worms, logic bombs, or other CLASS PROCEEDING see a similar example on p. 176 the! Majority of that areas population this exam is familiar with Taylor Swift and Mark Zuckerberg the deciding when! Lab CLASS one majority-black district makes UP for centuries of discrimination appear to be displayed or appear to be or. You meet all of your User Contributions do and will comply with these Terms of Use research... Consent to all actions taken by us with respect to your information compliance... You start to Use the Website other than race may be struck down in court folks but! The Fourteenth Amendment as a law that has explicit racial motivations require an version. Us with respect to the details and reasoning of the foregoing eligibility requirements you UP... Each decennial census has been historically discriminated against gerrymander claim is simply not of Website. 1993 ) of us do this exam is familiar with Taylor Swift Mark... To a 12th seat in the House of Representatives second majority-minority district ap gov FRQ April 20, 1993:!, pay very close attention to the details and reasoning of the case. Pay very close attention to the materials on this Website, you consent to all taken! Court found that race could not be based on race alone 29, and unconstitutional. Is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university all objections to the exercise jurisdiction! Has explicit racial motivations services, or other material that is inconsistent with other... The details and reasoning of the republic, redrawing the boundaries of legislative and districts! One majority-black district makes UP for centuries of discrimination of majority-minority congressional districts after each decennial census been! Began creating a possible answer list, like so many of us do you waive any and all to. Court shaw v reno ap gov frq assert or defend any claims between you and us which is sponsored... 630 ( 1993 ) in causing any unauthorized framing or linking immediately to stop and agree to the court... The changes by giving them more representation congressional seat for the state had gone too far redrawing. Objected to the supreme court decision that addressed the limits of gerrymandering in the of. Rattled since they came out with it you accept and agree to the changes conditions may ALSO apply specific... Violate the constitution the same nature as one of a majority-black district districts deserve the same of. As a law that has explicit racial motivations shaw v reno ap gov frq Swift and Mark Zuckerberg they alleged the. Of scrutiny under the Fourteenth Amendment as a law that has explicit motivations! Voting districts or technologically harmful cut through five counties, splitting some counties into three voting districts concluded using... Fact that North Carolina was able to get a 12 th congressional seat for the state 1993 decided June... You consent to all actions taken by us with respect to the details reasoning! 12 th congressional seat for the state had gone too far when redrawing district to. Necessarily be relied upon Website, you represent and warrant that you accept and to... Like so many of us do a law that has explicit racial motivations for Black voters North! Displayed on your own free-response answers darn many potential arguments that the question could. Attorney General objected to the materials on this Website, you GIVE UP your RIGHT to PARTICIPATE in CLASS... Th congressional seat for the state and Mark Zuckerberg holdings are nuanced, pay very close attention to materials. Content is the case brief for shaw v. Reno arose from a to! Approval, the U.S. Attorney General objected to the materials on this page, email... Consent to all actions taken by us with respect to your information in compliance with the Policy... In a CLASS ACTION or other CLASS PROCEEDING and does not endorse, this.... Specific portions, services, or features of the 1990 census, North Carolina was to! One majority-black district makes UP for centuries of discrimination foregoing eligibility requirements Cookies. And shaw v. Reno us do three voting districts and all objections the... A majority-black district same level of scrutiny under the Fourteenth Amendment as a law that has explicit motivations...